Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - New Zealand

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
S. B v. New Zealand 475/1991 31 March 1994 Inadmissible
Maori tribes v. New Zealand 547/1993 13 October 1995 Admissible
Drake et al . v. New Zealand 601/1994 03 April 1997 Inadmissible
Potter v. New Zealand 632/1995 28 July 1997 Inadmissible
Toala et al. v. New Zealand 675/1995 10 July 1998 Admissible
Tamihere v. New Zealand 891/1999 15 March 2000 Inadmissible
Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand 952/2000 22 March 2001 Inadmissible
Singh v. New Zealand 791/1997 12 July 2001 Inadmissible
Rajan v. New Zealand 820/1998 06 August 2003 Inadmissible
Fa'aaliga v. New Zealand 1279/2004 28 October 2005 Inadmissible
van der Plaat v. New Zealand 1492/2006 22 July 2008 Inadmissible
J. S. v. New Zealand 1752/2008 26 March 2012 Inadmissible
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand 2197/2012 25 March 2014 Inadmissible
A.W.K. V. New Zealand 1998/2010 28 October 2014 Inadmissible
L.F. v. New Zealand 2211/2012 30 March 2015 Inadmissible
Fa'afete v. New Zealand 1909/2009 13 July 2015 Inadmissible
J.G. v. New Zealand 2631/2015 02 November 2015 Inadmissible
V.S. v. New Zealand 2072/2011 02 November 2015 Inadmissible
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand 2567/2015 03 November 2016 Inadmissible
M.B. v. New Zealand 2934/2017 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
N.R. v. New Zealand 2801/2016 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.B. v. New Zealand 2934/2017 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
N.R. v. New Zealand 2801/2016 28 March 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".