|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - New Zealand
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| S. B v. New Zealand |
475/1991 |
31 March 1994 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Maori tribes v. New Zealand |
547/1993 |
13 October 1995 |
|
Admissible |
| Drake et al . v. New Zealand |
601/1994 |
03 April 1997 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| Potter v. New Zealand |
632/1995 |
28 July 1997 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Toala et al. v. New Zealand |
675/1995 |
10 July 1998 |
|
Admissible |
| A v. New Zealand |
754/1997 |
15 July 1999 |
9(1, 4) |
No Violation |
| Tamihere v. New Zealand |
891/1999 |
15 March 2000 |
14(1) |
Inadmissible |
| Buckle v. New Zealand |
858/1999 |
25 October 2000 |
17, 23 |
No Violation |
| Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand |
547/1993 |
27 October 2000 |
14(1), 27 |
No Violation |
| Toala et al. v. New Zealand |
675/1995 |
02 November 2000 |
12(4), 26 |
No Violation |
| Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand |
952/2000 |
22 March 2001 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Singh v. New Zealand |
791/1997 |
12 July 2001 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Joslin v. New Zealand |
902/1999 |
17 July 2002 |
16, 17, 23(1,2), 26 |
No Violation |
| Sahid v. New Zealand |
893/1999 |
28 March 2003 |
23(1) |
No Violation |
| Rajan v. New Zealand |
820/1998 |
06 August 2003 |
17, 23(1), 24(1), 26 |
Inadmissible |
| Rameka v. New Zealand |
1090/2002 |
06 November 2003 |
9, 9(4), 10(1), 14(2) |
Violation |
| Fa'aaliga v. New Zealand |
1279/2004 |
28 October 2005 |
|
Inadmissible |
| E.B. v. New Zealand |
1368/2005 |
16 March 2007 |
14(1), 17(1), 23(1) |
Violation |
| Manuel v. New Zealand |
1385/2005 |
18 October 2007 |
9(1) |
No Violation |
| van der Plaat v. New Zealand |
1492/2006 |
22 July 2008 |
15(1) |
Inadmissible |
| Dean v. New Zealand |
1512/2006 |
17 March 2009 |
2(3a), 7, 9(4), 10(1,3), 14(3c, 4, 5 ), 15(1), 26 |
Violation |
| Jessop v. New Zealand |
1758/2008 |
29 March 2011 |
14 (1,3c,e,5) |
No Violation |
| J. S. v. New Zealand |
1752/2008 |
26 March 2012 |
2(2, 3), 9(4), 14(1) |
Inadmissible |
| X.Q.H. v. New Zealand |
2197/2012 |
25 March 2014 |
2(3)(a), 14(1), 17(1), 23(1), 24(1) |
Inadmissible |
| A.W.K. V. New Zealand |
1998/2010 |
28 October 2014 |
2(3), 3(a)(b)(d)(e)(f), 5, 14(1) |
Inadmissible |
| L.F. v. New Zealand |
2211/2012 |
30 March 2015 |
14 (1)(3) (d) |
Inadmissible |
| Fa'afete v. New Zealand |
1909/2009 |
13 July 2015 |
2, 9, 14, 17, 26 |
Inadmissible |
| J.G. v. New Zealand |
2631/2015 |
02 November 2015 |
14(7) |
Inadmissible |
| V.S. v. New Zealand |
2072/2011 |
02 November 2015 |
9 (1), 14 (1), 19 (2) |
Inadmissible |
| A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand |
2567/2015 |
03 November 2016 |
17(1), 23(1) |
Inadmissible |
| M.B. v. New Zealand |
2934/2017 |
28 March 2017 |
14 (1), (2), (3), (5), 17 |
Inadmissible |
| N.R. v. New Zealand |
2801/2016 |
28 March 2017 |
2 (3), 14 (1), 16 |
Inadmissible |
| M.B. v. New Zealand |
2934/2017 |
28 March 2017 |
14 (1), (2), (3) and (5) and 17 |
Inadmissible |
| N.R. v. New Zealand |
2801/2016 |
28 March 2017 |
2 (3), 14 (1), 16 |
Inadmissible |
| Miller et.al. New Zealand |
2502/2014 |
07 November 2017 |
2, 9, 10, 14 (1) |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
