Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Norway

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
K. B. v. Norway 53/1979 14 August 1979 Inadmissible
S. S. v. Norway 79/1980 02 April 1982 Inadmissible
I. M. v. Norway 129/1982 06 April 1983 Inadmissible
O. F. v. Norway 158/1983 26 October 1984 Inadmissible
V. O. v. Norway 168/1984 17 July 1985 Inadmissible
A. and S. N. v. Norway 224/1987 11 July 1988 Inadmissible
Harward v. Norway 451/1991 26 July 1993 Admissible
Spakmo v. Norway 631/1995 20 March 1997 Admissible
Ben Said v. Norway 767/1997 21 July 1998 Admissible
Bech v. Norway 882/1999 15 March 2000 Inadmissible
Jonassen v. Norway 942/2000 25 October 2002 Inadmissible
N.U. v. Norway 2341/2014 28 October 2014 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".