Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Norway

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Harward v. Norway 451/1991 15 July 1994 14 (3b) No Violation
Bryhn v. Norway 789/1997 29 October 1999 14 (5) No Violation
Spakmo v. Norway 631/1995 05 November 1999 9 (1) Violation
Ben Said v. Norway 767/1997 29 March 2000 14(1) No Violation
Leirvåg v. Norway 1155/2003 03 November 2004 18, 18(4) Violation
Aboushanif v. Norway 1542/2007 17 July 2008 2(3)(a), 14(5) Violation
T.L.N. v. Norway 1942/2010 16 July 2014 14 No Violation
H.K. v. Norway 2004/2010 16 October 2014 14 No Violation
X v. Norway 2474/2014 05 November 2015 2(3), 7 No Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".