|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Peru
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Avellanal v. Peru |
202/1986 |
28 October 1988 |
3, 14(1), 26 |
Violation |
| Muñoz v. Peru |
203/1986 |
04 November 1988 |
14 (1,2), 25(c) |
Violation |
| González del Rio v. Peru |
263/1987 |
06 November 1990 |
9(1,4), 12(2), 14(1,2), 17 |
Admissible |
| Orihuela v. Peru |
309/1988 |
22 March 1991 |
|
Admissible |
| González del Rio v. Peru |
263/1987 |
28 October 1992 |
9(1,4), 12(2), 14(1,2), 17 |
Violation |
| Orihuela v. Peru |
309/1988 |
14 July 1993 |
10(1), 17, 26 |
Violation |
| Celis Laureano v. Peru |
540/1993 |
04 July 1994 |
|
Admissible |
| Celis Laureano v. Peru |
540/1993 |
25 March 1996 |
2(1), 6(1), 7, 9(1), 24(1) |
Violation |
| Polay Campos v. Peru |
577/1994 |
06 November 1997 |
7, 10(1),14(1, 2, 3b,d) |
Violation |
| Arredondo v. Peru |
688/1996 |
27 July 2000 |
9(1, 3), 10(1), 14(1, 3c) |
Violation |
| Gutiérrez Vicanco v. Peru |
678/1996 |
26 March 2002 |
14 (1, 3c) |
Violation |
| Chira Vargas v. Peru |
906/2000 |
22 July 2002 |
2(3), 14(1,2), 25(c) |
Violation |
| Gomez Casafranca v. Peru |
981/2001 |
22 July 2003 |
7, 9(1, 3), 14(1, 2, 3c), 15 |
Violation |
| Jorge Luis Quispe Roque v. Peru |
1125/2002 |
21 October 2005 |
9, 14 |
Violation |
| K. N. L. H. v. Peru |
1153/2003 |
24 October 2005 |
2, 7, 17, 24 |
Violation |
| Antonino Vargas Mas v. Peru |
1058/2002 |
26 October 2005 |
7, 9(1), 10(1), 14 |
Violation |
| Marlem Carranza Alegre v. Peru |
1126/2002 |
28 October 2005 |
2(1), 7, 9, 10, 14 |
Violation |
| Solís v. Peru |
1016/2001 |
27 March 2006 |
2(1), 25(c) |
No Violation |
| Poma v. Peru |
1457/2006 |
27 March 2009 |
2(3), 27 |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
