Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Philippines

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Piandiong et al. v. Philippines 869/1999 19 October 2000 6, 14 No Violation
Cagas v. Philippines 788/1997 23 October 2001 7, 9(3), 10, 14(1,2) Violation
Carpo et al. v. Philippines 1077/2002 28 March 2003 6(1) Violation
Wilson v. The Philippines 868/1999 30 October 2003 7, 9 (1, 2, 3), 10(1, 2) Violation
Ramil Rayos v. The Philippines 1167/2003 27 July 2004 6(1, 2), 7, 10(1), 14(3b) Violation
Rolando v. Philippines 1110/2002 03 November 2004 6(1), 7, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3),10(1), 14(3d) Violation
Rouse v. The Philippines 1089/2002 25 July 2005 7, 9(1), 14(1,3c,3e,5) Violation
Larraņaga v. Philippines 1421/2005 24 July 2006 7, 14, 14(1, 2, 3(b,c,d,e), 5) Violation
Pimentel v. Philippines 1320/2004 19 March 2007 2(3), 14(1) Violation
Lumango and Santos v. Philippines 1466/2006 20 March 2008 14(3)(c) Violation
Marcellana and Gumanoy v. The Philippines 1560/2007 30 October 2008 2(3), 6(1), 9(1) Violation
Pestaņo v. Philippines 1619/2007 23 March 2010 2(3), 2(3)(a), 6 Violation
Hernandez v. Philippines 1559/2007 26 July 2010 2(3),6,6(1) Violation
Adonis v. The Philippines 1815/2008 26 October 2011 14(3)(d), 19(3) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".