Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Poland

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Kall v. Poland 522/1993 14 July 1997 25(c) No Violation
Kurowski v. Poland 872/1999 18 March 2003   Inadmissible
Kolanowski v. Poland 837/1998 06 August 2003 14(1) Inadmissible
Bator v. Poland 1037/2001 22 July 2005   Inadmissible
Fijalkowska v. Poland 1061/2002 26 July 2005 9, 9(1,4) Violation
Wdowiak v. Poland 1446/2006 31 October 2006   Inadmissible
Rastorguev v. Poland 1517/2006 28 March 2011 9, 14(3b) No Violation
Gruca v. Poland 2183/2012 23 July 2015 7, 9, 10 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".