Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Portugal

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Koi v. Portugal 925/2000 22 October 2001   Inadmissible
da Silva Queiroz v. Portugal 969/2001 26 July 2005   Inadmissible
Correia de Matos v. Portugal 1123/2002 28 March 2006 14(3 d) Violation
Stow et al. v. Portugal 1496/2006 01 April 2008   Inadmissible
Gonçalves et al. v. Portugal 1565/2007 18 March 2010 26 No Violation
Machado Bartolomeu v. Portugal 1783/2008 19 October 2010 26 No Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".