Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Republic of Korea

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Sohn v. Republic of Korea 518/1992 18 March 1994 Admissible
Kim v. Republic of Korea 574/1994 14 March 1996 Admissible
Park v. Republic of Korea 628/1995 05 July 1996 Admissible
Ajaz and Jamil v. Republic of Korea 644/1995 19 March 1997 Admissible
Nam v. Republic of Korea 693/1996 28 July 2003 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".