Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Republic of Korea

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Sohn v. Republic of Korea 518/1992 19 July 1995 13, 19 (2,3) Violation
Park v. Republic of Korea 628/1995 20 October 1998 19, 22 Violation
Kim v. Republic of Korea 574/1994 03 November 1998 19(3) Violation
Ajaz and Jamil v. Republic of Korea 644/1995 13 July 1999 14 No Violation
Kang v. Republic of Korea 878/1999 15 July 2003 10(1, 3), 18(1), 19(1), 26 Violation
Shin v. Republic of Korea 926/2000 16 March 2004 19(2, 3) Violation
Lee v. Republic of Korea 1119/2002 20 July 2005 22(1,2) Violation
Jong-Cheol v. Republic of Korea 968/2001 26 July 2005 19(2,3) No Violation
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea 1321 & 1322/2004 03 November 2006 18 (1)(3) Violation
Jung et al. v. Republic of Korea 1593-1603/2007 23 March 2010 2(3)(a), 18(1) Violation
Min-Kyu Jeong et al. v. Republic of Korea 1642-1741/2007 24 March 2011 18(1) Violation
Kim et al v. Republic of Korea 1786/2008 25 October 2012 18 Violation
X v. the Republic of Korea 1908/2009 23 March 2014 7, 9 Violation
Kim et al v. Republic of Korea 2179/2012 15 October 2014 9, 18 Violation
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea 2273/2013 12 July 2018 2; 14 (1); 17 and 26 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".