Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Slovakia

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Drobek v. Slovakia 643/1995 14 July 1997 2, 26 Inadmissible
Mahmoud v. Slovakia 935/2000 23 July 2001   Inadmissible
Mátyus v. Slovakia 923/2000 22 July 2002 25(a, c) Violation
Yama and Khalid v. Slovakia 876/1999 31 October 2002   Inadmissible
Soltes v. Slovakia (and Czech Republic) 1034 and 1035/2001 28 October 2005   Inadmissible
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovak Republic 1963/2010 25 March 2014 3 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".