Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Sweden

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
D. F. et al. v. Sweden 183/1984 26 March 1985 Inadmissible
N. B. v. Sweden 175/1984 11 July 1985 Inadmissible
Celepli v. Sweden 456/1991 19 March 1993 Admissible
Silva v. Sweden 748/1997 18 October 1999 Inadmissible
I. N. v. Sweden 1055/2002 08 July 2002 Inadmissible
Nakrash and Qifen v. Sweden 1540/2007 30 October 2008 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".