Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Sweden

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Maroufidou v. Sweden 58/1979 (R.13/58) 09 April 1981 13 No Violation
D. F. et al. v. Sweden 183/1984 26 March 1985   Inadmissible
N. B. v. Sweden 175/1984 11 July 1985   Inadmissible
Blom v. Sweden 191/1985 04 April 1988 26 No Violation
Kitok v. Sweden 197/1985 27 July 1988 27 No Violation
Lindgren et al. and Lundquist et al. v. Sweden 298 & 299/1988 09 November 1990 26 No Violation
Celepli v. Sweden 456/1991 19 March 1993   Admissible
Celepli v. Sweden 456/1991 18 July 1994 12(1, 3) No Violation
Silva v. Sweden 748/1997 18 October 1999   Inadmissible
I. N. v. Sweden 1055/2002 08 July 2002 3 Inadmissible
Alzery v. Sweden 1416/2005 25 October 2006 2, 7, 13 Violation
Nakrash and Qifen v. Sweden 1540/2007 30 October 2008   Inadmissible
X. v. Sweden 1833/2008 01 November 2011 6, 7 Violation
M.I. v. Sweden 2149/2012 25 July 2013 7 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".