Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Belgium

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
De Clippele v. Belgium 1082/2002 28 March 2003 Inadmissible
J.O. et al. v. Belgium 1417/2005 28 October 2005 Inadmissible
M. v. Belgium 2176/2012 30 March 2015 Inadmissible
S.R. et al. v. Belgium 1895/2009 02 November 2015 Inadmissible
M.A.K. v. Belgium 2148/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M. A. K. v. Belgium 2148/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".