The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Articles	Outcome
Ackla v. Togo	505/1992	25 March 1996	12(1), (3)	Violation
Aduayom et al. v. Togo	422, 423, & 424/1990	12 July 1996	9(1, 5), 19, 25(c)	Violation
Randolph v. Togo	910/2000	27 October 2003	12	No Violation

Information is as of 24 August 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".