Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Uruguay

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Waksman v. Uruguay 31/1978 24 April 1979 Admissible
U.R. v. Uruguay 128/1982 06 April 1983 Inadmissible
S.G.F. v. Uruguay 136/1983 25 July 1983 Inadmissible
J.F. v. Uruguay 137/1983 25 July 1983 Inadmissible
Rodríguez Veiga v. Uruguay 487/1992 18 July 1994 Inadmissible
Sanjuan Martínez et al. v. Uruguay 1607/2007 22 July 2008 Inadmissible
G.C.A.A. v. Uruguay 2358/2014 11 February 2015 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".