Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Cameroon

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Mukong v. Cameroon 458/1991 21 July 1994 7, 9(1-4), 12(4), 14(3a,b), 19(3) Violation
Mazou v. Cameroon 630/1995 26 July 2001 2, 25 Violation
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon 1134/2002 17 March 2005 1, 9(1), 10(1, 2a), 12(1), 14(6), 24(3), 25(b) Violation
Njaru v. Cameroon 1353/2005 19 March 2007 2(3), 7, 9(1,2) 10, 19(2) Violation
Titiahonjo v. Cameroon 1186/2003 26 October 2007 2(3), 6(1), 7, 9(1,2,3,4) Violation
Engo v. Cameroon 1397/2005 22 July 2009 2(3a), 9(1,2,3,4), 10(1), 14(2,3a,b,c,d,5) Violation
Akwanga v. Cameroon 1813/2008 22 March 2011 7, 9 (2-4), 10 (1,2), 14 Violation
Monika v. Cameroon 1965/2010 21 October 2014 2, 6, 7, 9, 26 Violation
Kingue v. Cameroon 2388/2014 03 November 2016 2 (3), 9 (5) Violation
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon 2764/2016 08 November 2017 2 (3); 7; 9 (1), (3), (4), (5); 11; 14 (1), (2), (3) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".