Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Chile

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Barzana v. Chile 740/1998 23 July 1998   Inadmissible
Acuņa Inostroza et al. v. Chile 717/1996 23 July 1999   Inadmissible
Vargas v. Chile 718/1996 26 July 1999   Inadmissible
Menanteau v. Carrasco v. Chile 746/1997 26 July 1999   Inadmissible
Yurich v. Chile 1078/2002 02 November 2005   Inadmissible
Montecino v. Chile 1504/2006 30 October 2008   Inadmissible
Cifuentes Elgueta v. Chile 1536/2006 28 July 2009   Inadmissible
Claudia Andrea Marchant Reyes et al. v. Chile 2627/2015 07 November 2017 2 (3) (a), 14, 19 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".