|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Czech Republic
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Drbal v. Czech Republic |
498/1992 |
22 July 1994 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Simunek et al. v. Czech Republic |
516/1992 |
19 July 1995 |
14(6), 26 |
Violation |
| Adam v. Czech Republic |
586/1994 |
23 July 1996 |
26 |
Violation |
| Malik v. Czech Republic |
669/1995 |
21 October 1998 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Schlosser v. Czech Republic |
670/1995 |
21 October 1998 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Jakes and Mazurkiewiczova v. Czech Republic |
724/1996 |
26 July 1999 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Koutny v. Czech Republic |
807/1998 |
20 March 2000 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Blazek et al. v. Czech Republic |
857/1999 |
12 July 2001 |
26 |
Violation |
| Fábryová v. Czech Republic |
765/1997 |
30 October 2001 |
26 |
Violation |
| Des Fours v. Czech Republic |
747/1997 |
30 October 2001 |
2, 14(1), 26 |
Violation |
| Brok v. Czech Republic |
774/1997 |
31 October 2001 |
2, 26 |
Violation |
| Paterav. Czech Republic |
946/2000 |
25 July 2002 |
2, 17 |
Violation |
| Pezoldova v. Czech Republic |
757/1997 |
25 October 2002 |
2,26 |
Violation |
| Hruska v. Czech Republic |
1191/2003 |
30 October 2003 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Czernin v. Czech Republic |
823/1998 |
29 March 2005 |
2(3), 14(1) |
Violation |
| Marik v. Czech Republic |
945/2000 |
26 July 2005 |
26 |
Violation |
| Soltes v. Czech Republic (and Slovakia)
|
1034 and 1035/2001 |
28 October 2005 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Kriz v. Czech Republic |
1054/2002 |
01 November 2005 |
26 |
Violation |
| Smídek v. Czech Republic |
1062/2002 |
25 July 2006 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Polacek v. Czech Republic |
1445/2006 |
24 July 2007 |
26 |
Violation |
| Chytil v. Czech Republic |
1452/2006 |
24 July 2007 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Gratzinger v. Czech Republic |
1463/2006 |
25 October 2007 |
26 |
Violation |
| Zdenek and Ondracka v. Czech Republic |
1533/2006 |
31 October 2007 |
26 |
Violation |
| Lnenicka v. Czech Republic |
1484/2006 |
25 March 2008 |
26 |
Violation |
| Süsser v. Czech Republic |
1488/2006 |
25 March 2008 |
26 |
Violation |
| Schmidl v. Czech Republic |
1515/2006 |
01 April 2008 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Vlcek v. Czech Republic |
1485/2006 |
10 July 2008 |
2(3a), 26 |
Violation |
| Kohoutek v. Czech Republic |
1448/2006 |
17 July 2008 |
2(3)(a), 26 |
Violation |
| Preiss v. Czech Republic |
1497/2006 |
17 July 2008 |
2(3)(a), 26 |
Violation |
| Amundson v. Czech Republic |
1508/2006 |
17 March 2009 |
2(3a), 26 |
Violation |
| Persan v. Czech Republic |
1479/2006 |
24 March 2009 |
2(3a), 26 |
Violation |
| Aster v. Czech Republic |
1575/2007 |
27 March 2009 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Slezák v. Czech Republic |
1574/2007 |
20 July 2009 |
2(3a), 26 |
Violation |
| Kudma v. Czech Republic |
1582/2007 |
21 July 2009 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Dvorak v. Czech Republic |
1614/2007 |
28 July 2009 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| ?roub v. Czech Republic |
1573/2007
|
27 October 2009 |
1(2)
|
Inadmissible |
| Brychta v. Czech Republic
|
1618/2007
|
27 October 2009 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Novotny v. Czech Republic |
1778/2008 |
19 March 2010 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Zavrel v. Czech Republic |
1615/2007 |
27 July 2010 |
26 |
Violation |
| Wahlstatt v. Czech Republic |
1491/2006 |
27 July 2010 |
26 |
Violation |
| Gschwind v Czech Republic |
1742/2007 |
27 July 2010 |
26 |
Violation |
| Jahelka v. Czech Republic |
1583/2007 |
25 October 2010 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Drda v. Czech Republic |
1581/2007 |
27 October 2010 |
26 |
Violation |
| Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic |
1748/2008 |
28 October 2010 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Lange v. Czech Republic |
1586/2007 |
13 July 2011 |
26 |
Violation |
| V. H. v. Czech Republic |
1546/2007 |
19 July 2011 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Jünglingová v. Czech Republic |
1563/2007 |
24 October 2011 |
26 |
Violation |
| S. L. v. Czech Republic |
1850/2008 |
26 October 2011 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Klain and Klain v. Czech Republic |
1847/2008 |
01 November 2011 |
26 |
Violation |
| B. K. v. Czech Republic |
1844/2008 |
23 July 2012 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| D. V. and H. V. v. Czech Republic |
1848/2008 |
23 July 2012 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| M.B. v. Czech Republic |
1849/2008 |
29 October 2012 |
14 |
Inadmissible |
| V.B. v. Czech Republic |
1809/2008 |
24 July 2013 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| B. & C. v. Czech Republic |
1967/2010 |
02 April 2015 |
2, 26 |
Inadmissible |
| X. v. Czech Republic |
1961/2010 |
02 April 2015 |
2(1) (3), 14 (1) , 26 |
Inadmissible |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
