Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Denmark

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
J.J. v. Denmark 60/1979 26 March 1980 Inadmissible
K.L. v. Denmark 59/1979 26 March 1980 Inadmissible
K.L. v. Denmark 72/1980 31 July 1980 Inadmissible
K.L. v. Denmark 81/1980 27 March 1981 Inadmissible
A.M. v. Denmark 121/1982 (R.26/121) 23 July 1982 Inadmissible
P.S. v. Denmark 397/1990 22 July 1992 Inadmissible
Ahmed and Abdo-Hamid v. Denmark 1487/2006 01 April 2008 Inadmissible
Andersen v. Denmark 1868/2009 26 July 2010 Inadmissible
A.W.P v. Denmark 1879/2009 01 November 2013 Inadmissible
X. v. Denmark 2523/2015 01 April 2015 Inadmissible
X. v. Denmark 2515/2014 01 April 2015 Inadmissible
N. v. Denmark 2426/2014 23 July 2015 Inadmissible
I.A.A. et al. v. Denmark 2428/2014 23 July 2015 Inadmissible
R.G. et al. v. Denmark 2351/2014 02 November 2015 Inadmissible
E.P. and F.P. v. Denmark 2344/2014 02 November 2015 Inadmissible
A.A.I. and A.H.A. v. Denmark 2402/2014 29 March 2016 Inadmissible
A. v. Denmark 2357/2014 30 March 2016 Inadmissible
A.N. v. Denmark 2039/2011 30 March 2016 Inadmissible
I.M.Y. v. Denmark 2559/2015 14 July 2016 Inadmissible
A.M.M. v. Denmark 2415/2014 14 July 2016 Inadmissible
V.R. and N.R. v. Denmark 2745/2016 14 July 2016 Inadmissible
I.A.K. v. Denmark 2115/2011 03 November 2016 Inadmissible
A.H.S. v. Denmark 2473/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.J.K. v. Denmark 2338/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
D and E v. Denmark 2293/2013 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
A.H.S. v. Denmark 2473/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.J.K. v. Denmark 2338/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
D and E v. Denmark 2293/2013 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
S.Z. v. Denmark 2625/2015 28 July 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".