The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Articles	Outcome
Bolaños v. Ecuador	238/1987	26 July 1989	3, 9 (1, 3, 5), 14(1,3c)	Violation
García v. Ecuador	319/1988	18 October 1990		Admissible
García v. Ecuador	319/1988	05 November 1991	7, 9, 13	Violation
Jijón v. Ecuador	277/1988	26 March 1992	7, 9(1,2), 10(1), 14(7)	Violation
Fuenzalida v. Ecuador	480/1991	12 July 1996	7, 9, 10, 14(3c, e), (5)	Violation
Ortega v. Ecuador	481/1991	08 April 1997	7, 10(1)	Violation

Information is as of 18 July 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".