Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Equatorial Guinea

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Bahamonde v. Equatorial Guinea 468/1991 20 October 1993 9(1, 3), 12(1, 2), 14(1), 26 Violation
Mika Miha v. Equatorial Guinea 414/1990 08 July 1994 7, 9(1,2), 10(1), 12(1, 2), 19(1, 2) Violation
Ndong et al. and Mic Abogo v. Equatorial Guinea 1152 and 1190/2003 31 October 2005 2(3), 7, 9, 14 (1, 3a, b, d, g) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".