Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Estonia

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Borzov v. Estonia 1136/2002 26 July 2004 26 No Violation
Tsarjov v. Estonia 1223/2003 26 October 2007 2(1), 26 No Violation
ipin v. Estonia 1423/2005 09 July 2008 26 No Violation
Sedljar and Lavrov v. Estonia 1532/2006 29 March 2011 14 (1, 3e) No Violation
Zeynalov v. Estonia 2040/2011 04 November 2015 2, 14(3d,f) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".