Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Finland

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
L.T.K. v. Finland 185/1984 09 July 1985 Inadmissible
E.H. v. Finland 170/1984 25 October 1985 Inadmissible
J.H. v. Finland 300/1988 23 March 1989 Inadmissible
R.M. v. Finland 301/1988 23 March 1989 Inadmissible
C.W. v. Finland 379/1989 30 March 1990 Inadmissible
O.J. v. Finland 419/1990 06 November 1990 Inadmissible
C.E.A. v. Finland 316/1988 10 July 1991 Inadmissible
A.M. v. Finland 398/1990 23 July 1992 Inadmissible
I.P. v. Finland 450/1991 26 July 1993 Inadmissible
Länsman et al. v. Finland 511/1992 14 October 1993 Admissible
K.J.L. v. Finland 544/1993 03 November 1993 Inadmissible
Sara et al. v. Finland 431/1990 23 March 1994 Inadmissible
Hankala v. Finland 850/1999 25 March 1999 Inadmissible
Linder v. Finland 1420/2005 28 October 2005 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".