|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Finland
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Hartikainen v. Finland |
40/1978 |
09 April 1981 |
18(4) |
No Violation |
| Hertzberg et al. v. Finland |
61/1979 (R.14/61) |
02 April 1982 |
19(2, 3) |
No Violation |
| Muhonen v. Finland |
89/1981 |
08 April 1985 |
14(6) |
No Violation |
| L.T.K. v. Finland |
185/1984 |
09 July 1985 |
18,19 |
Inadmissible |
| E.H. v. Finland |
170/1984 |
25 October 1985 |
26 |
Inadmissible |
| J.H. v. Finland |
300/1988 |
23 March 1989 |
7, 14 |
Inadmissible |
| R.M. v. Finland |
301/1988 |
23 March 1989 |
7, 14 |
Inadmissible |
| Vuolanne v. Finland |
265/1987 |
07 April 1989 |
2(1, 3), 7, 9(4), 10(1) |
Violation |
| C.W. v. Finland |
379/1989 |
30 March 1990 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Torres v. Finland |
291/1988 |
02 April 1990 |
7, 9(4) |
Violation |
| Järvinen v. Finland |
295/1988 |
25 July 1990 |
8, 26 |
No Violation |
| O.J. v. Finland |
419/1990 |
06 November 1990 |
|
Inadmissible |
| C.E.A. v. Finland |
316/1988 |
10 July 1991 |
|
Inadmissible |
| A.M. v. Finland |
398/1990 |
23 July 1992 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Karttunen v. Finland |
387/1989 |
23 October 1992 |
14(1) |
Violation |
| I.P. v. Finland |
450/1991 |
26 July 1993 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Länsman et al. v. Finland |
511/1992 |
14 October 1993 |
|
Admissible |
| K.J.L. v. Finland |
544/1993 |
03 November 1993 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Sara et al. v. Finland |
431/1990 |
23 March 1994 |
27 |
Inadmissible |
| Kivenmaa v. Finland |
412/1990 |
31 March 1994 |
15, 19(2), 21 |
Violation |
| Peltonen v. Finland |
492/1992 |
21 July 1994 |
12(2, 3) |
No Violation |
| Länsman et al. v. Finland |
511/1992 |
26 October 1994 |
27 |
No Violation |
| Länsman et al. v. Finland |
671/1995 |
30 October 1996 |
27 |
No Violation |
| Hankala v. Finland |
850/1999 |
25 March 1999 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland |
779/1997 |
24 October 2001 |
2, 14(1), 27 |
Violation |
| Olavi v. Finland |
1076/2002 |
15 March 2005 |
14(1), 26 |
No Violation |
| Länsman III v. Finland |
1023/2001 |
17 March 2005 |
27 |
No Violation |
| Linder v. Finland |
1420/2005 |
28 October 2005 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Paadar v. Findland |
2102/2011 |
26 March 2014 |
14, 26, 27 |
No Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
