|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - France
List of all final views
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
Gueye et al. v. France |
196/1983 |
03 April 1989 |
26 |
Violation |
Morael v. France |
207/1986 |
28 July 1989 |
14(1, 2), 17(1), 26 |
No Violation |
Guesdon v. France |
219/1986 |
25 July 1990 |
14(1,3e,f), 26 |
No Violation |
Cadoret and Bihan v. France |
221 & 323/1988 |
11 April 1991 |
14(3e,f), 26 |
No Violation |
Barzhig v. France |
327/1988 |
11 April 1991 |
14(1, 3f), 26 |
No Violation |
Casanovas v. France |
441/1990 |
19 July 1994 |
14(1) |
No Violation |
Faurisson v. France |
550/1993 |
08 November 1996 |
19(3) |
No Violation |
Hopu and Bessert v. France |
549/1993 |
29 July 1997 |
14(1), 17(1), 23(1), 26 |
Violation |
Foin v. France |
666/1995 |
03 November 1999 |
26 |
Violation |
Maille v. France |
689/1996 |
10 July 2000 |
8, 26 |
Violation |
Venier and Nicolas v. France |
690 & 691/1996 |
10 July 2000 |
8, 26 |
Violation |
Karker v. France |
833/1998 |
26 October 2000 |
12(3), 13 |
No Violation |
Wackenheim v. France |
854/1999 |
15 July 2002 |
26 |
No Violation |
Gillot v. France |
932/2000 |
15 July 2002 |
12, 25, 26 |
No Violation |
Casanovas v. France |
1514/2006 |
28 October 2008 |
2(3)(a,b), 14(1,2) |
No Violation |
Cochet v. France |
1760/2008 |
21 October 2010 |
15(1) |
Violation |
Crochet v. France |
1777/2008 |
25 October 2010 |
14(1) |
No Violation |
J. O. v. France |
1620/2007 |
23 March 2011 |
14 (2,3 a,b,5) |
Violation |
Singh v. France |
1876/2009 |
22 July 2011 |
18 (1, 3) |
Violation |
Singh v. France |
1852/2008 |
01 November 2012 |
2, 7, 18, 26 |
Violation |
Singh v. France |
1928/2010 |
19 July 2013 |
2, 12, 18, 26 |
Violation |
Ory v. France |
1960/2010 |
28 March 2014 |
12, 26 |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|