Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - France

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Gueye et al. v. France 196/1983 03 April 1989 26 Violation
Morael v. France 207/1986 28 July 1989 14(1, 2), 17(1), 26 No Violation
Guesdon v. France 219/1986 25 July 1990 14(1,3e,f), 26 No Violation
Cadoret and Bihan v. France 221 & 323/1988 11 April 1991 14(3e,f), 26 No Violation
Barzhig v. France 327/1988 11 April 1991 14(1, 3f), 26 No Violation
Casanovas v. France 441/1990 19 July 1994 14(1) No Violation
Faurisson v. France 550/1993 08 November 1996 19(3) No Violation
Hopu and Bessert v. France 549/1993 29 July 1997 14(1), 17(1), 23(1), 26 Violation
Foin v. France 666/1995 03 November 1999 26 Violation
Maille v. France 689/1996 10 July 2000 8, 26 Violation
Venier and Nicolas v. France 690 & 691/1996 10 July 2000 8, 26 Violation
Karker v. France 833/1998 26 October 2000 12(3), 13 No Violation
Wackenheim v. France 854/1999 15 July 2002 26 No Violation
Gillot v. France 932/2000 15 July 2002 12, 25, 26 No Violation
Casanovas v. France 1514/2006 28 October 2008 2(3)(a,b), 14(1,2) No Violation
Cochet v. France 1760/2008 21 October 2010 15(1) Violation
Crochet v. France 1777/2008 25 October 2010 14(1) No Violation
J. O. v. France 1620/2007 23 March 2011 14 (2,3 a,b,5) Violation
Singh v. France 1876/2009 22 July 2011 18 (1, 3) Violation
Singh v. France 1852/2008 01 November 2012 2, 7, 18, 26 Violation
Singh v. France 1928/2010 19 July 2013 2, 12, 18, 26 Violation
Ory v. France 1960/2010 28 March 2014 12, 26 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".