The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Outcome
K.V. and C.V. v. Germany	568/1993	08 April 1994	Inadmissible
Maloney v. Germany	755/1997	29 July 1997	Inadmissible
Rogl v. Germany	808/1998	25 October 2000	Inadmissible
Kehler v. Germany	834/1998	22 March 2001	Inadmissible
Neremberg v. Germany	991/2001	27 July 2001	Inadmissible
P. L. v. Germany	1003/2001	22 October 2003	Inadmissible
Arenz v. Germany	1138/2002	24 March 2004	Inadmissible
Petersen v. Germany	1115/2002	01 April 2004	Inadmissible
Vlad v. Germany	1214/2003	01 April 2004	Inadmissible
Riedl-Riedenstein v. Germany	1188/2003	02 November 2004	Inadmissible
Radosevic v. Germany	1292/2004	22 July 2005	Inadmissible
Gilberg v. Germany	1403/2005	25 July 2006	Inadmissible
Schmidl v. Germany	1516/2006	31 October 2007	Inadmissible
Aduhene and Agyeman v. Germany	1543/2007	22 July 2008	Inadmissible

Information is as of 31 October 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".