 |
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Germany
Complete list of decisions
| Case Name | Comm Number | Date | Articles | Outcome |
|---|
| K.V. and C.V. v. Germany | 568/1993 | 08 April 1994 | | Inadmissible |
| Maloney v. Germany | 755/1997 | 29 July 1997 | | Inadmissible |
| Rogl v. Germany | 808/1998 | 25 October 2000 | 14, 17 | Inadmissible |
| Kehler v. Germany | 834/1998 | 22 March 2001 | | Inadmissible |
| Neremberg v. Germany | 991/2001 | 27 July 2001 | | Inadmissible |
| Baumgarten v. Germany | 960/2000 | 31 July 2003 | 6, 15, 15(1), 26 | No Violation |
| P. L. v. Germany | 1003/2001 | 22 October 2003 | | Inadmissible |
| Arenz v. Germany | 1138/2002 | 24 March 2004 | 2(1), 25 | Inadmissible |
| Petersen v. Germany | 1115/2002 | 01 April 2004 | 26 | Inadmissible |
| Vlad v. Germany | 1214/2003 | 01 April 2004 | | Inadmissible |
| Riedl-Riedenstein v. Germany | 1188/2003 | 02 November 2004 | 14(1), 26 | Inadmissible |
| Radosevic v. Germany | 1292/2004 | 22 July 2005 | 8(3)(c)(i), 26 | Inadmissible |
| Gilberg v. Germany | 1403/2005 | 25 July 2006 | | Inadmissible |
| Schmidl v. Germany
| 1516/2006 | 31 October 2007 | 26 | Inadmissible |
| Aduhene and Agyeman v. Germany | 1543/2007 | 22 July 2008 | | Inadmissible |
| M.G. v. Germany | 1482/2006 | 23 July 2008 | 2(3)(a), 7, 14(1), 17 | Violation |
| Sama v. Germany | 1771/2008 | 28 July 2009 | | Inadmissible |
Information is as of 8 January 2010.
CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
|
