Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Germany

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
K.V. and C.V. v. Germany 568/1993 08 April 1994   Inadmissible
Maloney v. Germany 755/1997 29 July 1997   Inadmissible
Rogl v. Germany 808/1998 25 October 2000 14, 17 Inadmissible
Kehler v. Germany 834/1998 22 March 2001   Inadmissible
Neremberg v. Germany 991/2001 27 July 2001   Inadmissible
Baumgarten v. Germany 960/2000 31 July 2003 6, 15, 15(1), 26 No Violation
P. L. v. Germany 1003/2001 22 October 2003   Inadmissible
Arenz v. Germany 1138/2002 24 March 2004 2(1), 25 Inadmissible
Petersen v. Germany 1115/2002 01 April 2004 26 Inadmissible
Vlad v. Germany 1214/2003 01 April 2004   Inadmissible
Riedl-Riedenstein v. Germany 1188/2003 02 November 2004 14(1), 26 Inadmissible
Radosevic v. Germany 1292/2004 22 July 2005 8(3)(c)(i), 26 Inadmissible
Gilberg v. Germany 1403/2005 25 July 2006   Inadmissible
Schmidl v. Germany 1516/2006 31 October 2007 26 Inadmissible
Aduhene and Agyeman v. Germany 1543/2007 22 July 2008   Inadmissible
M.G. v. Germany 1482/2006 23 July 2008 2(3)(a), 7, 14(1), 17 Violation
Sama Gbondo v.Germany 1771/2008 28 July 2009   Inadmissible
Loth v. Germany 1754/2008 23 March 2010   Inadmissible
G. E. v. Germany 1789/2008 26 March 2012 17, 26 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of April 2017. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".