|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Guyana
List of all final views
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
Yasseen and Thomas v. Republic of Guyana |
676/1996 |
30 March 1998 |
6, 7, 10(2), 14(1, 3a-e,g) |
Violation |
Sahadeo v. Guyana |
728/1996 |
01 November 2001 |
7, 9(3), 14 (3c,g) |
Violation |
Henricks v. Guyana |
838/1998 |
28 October 2002 |
6, 9(3), 14(3c, d, e, g) |
Violation |
Smartt v. Republic of Guyana |
867/1999 |
06 July 2004 |
6, 14(3d) |
Violation |
Mulai v. Republic of Guyana |
811/1998 |
20 July 2004 |
6, 14(1) |
Violation |
Deolall v. Republic of Guyana |
912/2000 |
01 November 2004 |
6, 14, 14(1), 14(3g) |
Violation |
Hussain and Hussain v. Guyana |
862/1999 |
25 October 2005 |
6(1) |
Violation |
Chan v. Guyana |
913/2000 |
31 October 2005 |
6, 14(3b,d) |
Violation |
Persaud v. Guyana |
812/1998 |
21 March 2006 |
6(1), 7 |
Violation |
Gonzalez Muņoz v. Guyana |
1246/2004 |
25 March 2010 |
2(3), 14(1), 17(1) |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|