Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Hungary

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Párkányi v. Hungary 410/1990 27 July 1992 10, 14(1, 3e) Violation
Kulomin v. Hungary 521/1992 22 March 1996 9(3), 10, 14 Violation
Somers v. Hungary 566/1993 23 July 1996 26 No Violation
Borisenko v. Hungary 852/1999 14 October 2002 9(1),(2),(3),14(3)(d) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".