Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Kazakhstan

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan 2027/2011 25 March 2013 Inadmissible
E.Z. v. Kazakhstan 2021/2010 01 April 2015 Inadmissible
M.Z. v. Kazakhstan 2145/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
I.T. v. Kazakhstan 2140/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.Z. v. Kazakhstan 2145/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
S.Sh. v. Kazakhstan 2842/2016 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
I.T. v. Kazakhstan 2140/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".