Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Kazakhstan

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Israil v. Kazakhstan 2024/2011 31 October 2011 2, 2(3), 6, 7, 9(1) Violation
Abdussamatov et al. v. Kazakhstan 444/2010 01 June 2012 3 No Violation
Valetov v. Kazakhstan 2104/2011 17 March 2014 7, 14 Violation
Ilyasov v. Kazakhstan 2009/2010 23 July 2014 2, 12, 14, 23, 26 Violation
Leven v. Kazakhstan 2131/2012 21 October 2014 18, 26 No Violation
Toregozhina v. Kazakhstan 2137/2012 21 October 2014 9, 12, 19, 21 Violation
Dzhakishev v. Kazakhstan 2304/2013 06 November 2015 6(1), 7, 9, 10, 14(1), 2, 3 (a-d) Violation
Esergepov v. Kazakhstan 2129/2012 29 March 2016 9 (1), (2), 10 (1), 14 (1), (2), (3) (b), (d),(e), 17 (1), (2), 19 (1),(2) Violation
Tyan v. Kazakhstan 2125/2011 16 March 2017 2 (3), 7, 9, 10, 14 Violation
Dmitry Tyan v. Kazakhstan 2125/2011 16 March 2017 2 (3), 7, 9, 10, 14 Violation
Zhasian Suleimenov v. Kazakhstan 2146/2012 21 March 2017 10(1), 14, 18, 2, 7, 9 Violation
Sviridov v. Kazakhstan 2158/2012 13 July 2017 19(2) Violation
Vladislav Chelakh v. Kazakhstan 2645/2015 07 November 2017 9 (1),14 (1), (3) (b), (d),(g) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".