 |
Jurisprudence
CEDAW
Complete list of decisions
| Case Name | Comm Number | Date | Articles | Outcome |
|---|
| B. J. v. Germany | 1/2003 | 14 July 2004 | | Inadmissible |
| A. T. v. Hungary | 2/2003 | 26 January 2005 | 2(a,b,e), 5(a), 16 | Violation |
| Kayhan v. Turkey | 8/2005 | 27 January 2006 | | Inadmissible |
| Szijjarto v. Hungary | 4/2004 | 14 August 2006 | 10(h), 12, 16(1e) | Violation |
| Nguyen v. The Netherlands | 3/2004 | 14 August 2006 | 11(2, 2b) | No Violation |
| Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 11/2006 | 22 January 2007 | | Inadmissible |
| N.S.E. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 10/2005 | 30 May 2007 | | Inadmissible |
| Goekce v. Austria | 5/2005 | 06 August 2007 | 1, 2(a,c-f), 3 | Violation |
| Yildirim v. Austria | 6/2005 | 06 August 2007 | 1, 2(a,c-f), 3 | Violation |
| Muņoz Vargas and de Vicuņa v. Spain | 7/2005 | 09 August 2007 | | Inadmissible |
| Zheng v. The Netherlands | 15/2007 | 07 October 2008 | | Inadmissible |
| G.D. and S.F. v. France | 12/2007 | 04 August 2009 | 16(1), 16(1)(g) | Inadmissible |
| Dayras et al. v. France | 13/2007 | 04 August 2009 | 16(1), 16(1)(g) | Inadmissible |
| Vertido v. The Philippines | 18/2008 | 16 July 2010 | 1, 2 (c,f), 5(a) | Violation |
| V. K. v. Bulgaria | 20/2008 | 25 July 2011 | 1, 2(c, d, e,f), 5(a), 16 (1) | Violation |
| Abramova v. Belarus | 23/2011 | 25 July 2011 | 1, 2(a, b, d, e, f), 3, 5(a) | Violation |
| Teixeira v. Brazil | 17/2008 | 25 July 2011 | 1, 2(c, e), 12(1, 2) | Violation |
Information is as of 4 January 2012.
CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
|
