Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CEDAW - Denmark

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
M. N. N. v. Denmark 33/2011 13 June 2013 Inadmissible
M. E. N. v. Denmark 35/2011 13 July 2013 Inadmissible
M.S. v. Denmark 40/2012 22 July 2013 Inadmissible
M. K. D. A.-A. v. Denmark 44/2012 18 October 2013 Inadmissible
Y.C. v. Denmark 59/2013 24 October 2014 Admissible
T.N. v. Denmark 37/2012 03 November 2014 Inadmissible
Y.W. v. Denmark 51/2013 02 March 2015 Inadmissible
O.V.J. v. Denmark 50/2013 23 July 2015 Inadmissible
V. v. Denmark 57/2013 11 July 2016 Inadmissible
K.S. v. Denmark 64/2013 19 July 2016 Inadmissible
P.M.C. v. Denmark 56/2013 09 November 2016 Inadmissible
S.J.A. v. Denmark 079/2014 06 November 2017 Inadmissible
H.D. v. Denmark 076/2014 09 July 2018 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".