Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CERD - Denmark

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
C.P. and M.P. v. Denmark 5/1994 15 March 1995 Inadmissible
Mostafa v. Denmark 19/2000 10 August 2001 Inadmissible
K.R.C. v. Denmark 23/2002 13 August 2002 Inadmissible
P.O.E.M. and F.A.S.M. v. Denmark 22/2002 19 March 2003 Inadmissible
Sadic v. Denmark 25/2002 21 March 2003 Inadmissible
Documentary and Advisory Centre on Racial Discrimination v. Denmark 28/2003 19 August 2003 Inadmissible
P.S.N. v. Denmark 36/2006 08 August 2007 Inadmissible
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark 37/2006 08 August 2007 Inadmissible
Hermansen et al. v. Denmark 44/2009 13 August 2010 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".