Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CERD - France

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Diop v. France 2/1989 22 August 1990 1 (2) Admissible
Diop v. France 2/1989 18 March 1991 1(1,2), 5(e) No Violation
Regerat et al. v. France 24/2002 21 March 2003   Inadmissible
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France 052/2012 10 May 2016 2(6) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".