Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CRC

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Abdul-Hamid Aziz v. Spain 1/2014 04 June 2015 Inadmissible
A.A.A. v. Spain 2/2015 30 September 2016 Inadmissible
A.B.H and M.B.H. v. Costa Rica 5/2016 17 January 2017 Inadmissible
S.C.S. v. France 010/2017 25 January 2018 Inadmissible
Z.Y. and J.Y. v. Denmark 007/2016 31 May 2018 Inadmissible
Y.M. v. Spain 008/2016 31 May 2018 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".